Human Rights Watch:
The death on December 29, 2012, of a 23-year-old student who was gang
raped and assaulted should spur decisive action by the Indian government to
combat sexual violence, Human Rights Watch said today.
The attack catalyzed
massive nationwide demonstrations and reopened public debate about
reforming India’s inadequate laws and practices concerning sexual
assault.
The woman, a paramedical student whose name has not
been made public, and a male friend were traveling in a private bus in New
Delhi on December 16 when five men and a youth under 18 raped and assaulted
her and beat her friend.
The woman suffered severe injuries and was
transferred to a hospital in Singapore, where she died.
The police have
arrested the accused and are expected to file charges in the first week of
January 2013.
“This murderous gang rape is a sobering
reminder of the pervasive sexual violence that women and girls across India
suffer,”
said Meenakshi Ganguly, South Asia director.
“The
government needs to act now to prevent sexual assault, aggressively
investigate and prosecute perpetrators, and ensure the dignified treatment
of survivors.”
The New Delhi gang rape highlighted the
widespread problem of sexual violence in India, Human Rights Watch said.
According to the National Crime Records Bureau, 24,206 rape cases were
registered in India in 2011, and experts say the number of unreported cases
of sexual assault is much higher.
Following the New Delhi
attack, the Indian central government formed a three-member commission
headed by former Indian Supreme Court Chief Justice Jagdish Sharan Verma,
to “review[] the present laws so as to provide speedier justice and
enhanced punishment in cases of aggravated sexual assault.”
While the
government’s swift action to create a commission to review punishment
for aggravated sexual assault is an important step, reform of the criminal
law and procedure, plus improved treatment of survivors, is needed to
ensure justice for sexual assault victims, Human Rights Watch said.
Strengthen Mechanisms to Implement Laws and Support Survivors
The Delhi gang rape reflects a much larger problem of sexual violence in
India, Human Rights Watch said.
While officials responded swiftly and
promised speedy justice, the attack followed numerous reported sexual
assaults in the country, including against women with disabilities and
dalits.
For example, on December 27 the media reported that a girl in
Punjab committed suicide a month after she was gang raped because police
were unwilling to register her complaint or arrest the accused.
State security forces have at times been implicated in sexual assault,
but the government has not taken action against them.
For example, in
October 2011 police in Chhattisgarh were accused of sexual assaultof an
adivasi teacher, Soni Sori, while she was in their custody.
There still
have been no arrests and prosecutions in the alleged rape and murder in
2004 of Manorama Devi, who was taken into army custody from her home in the
northeastern state of Manipur.
In May 2012, about 90 civil
society organizations and individuals, including Human Rights Watch, wrote
to Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh urging reforms in responses to
sexual assault and calling for greater police accountability.
The groups
called on the Indian central government to constitute a high-level task
force to develop a coordinated response to gender-based violence,
especially sexual assault; instruct state governments to monitor police
handling of sexual assault reports and investigations, and hold accountable
officers who mishandle their duties; and fund an existing scheme for
financial assistance for rape victims and monitor its implementation.
The level of care – including counseling – provided to
the New Delhi gang rape victim and her family, demonstrates that political
will can ensure support and care for victims of sexual assault, Human
Rights Watch said.
But this only followed public outrage and demonstrations
after the attack.
Human Rights Watch research has found that survivors
usually find it difficult to register police complaints, and often go from
one hospital to another even for a medical examination, and often report
suffering humiliation at police stations and hospitals.
India
does not have a uniform protocol for medical treatment and examination of
survivors of sexual assault, making responses ad hoc and unpredictable, and
in the worst cases, degrading and counter-productive.
This is reflected in
the continued use of the so-called “finger test,” which Human
Rights Watch documented in a 2010 report.
While conducting medical
examinations, many doctors record unscientific and degrading findings,
which involve noting the “laxity” of the vagina or hymen,
apparently to determine whether the victims are “virgins” or
“habituated to sexual intercourse.”
Often doctors, police, and
judges look for evidence of “struggle” or
“injuries,” especially hymenal injuries, in the medical
examination report, discrediting those who do not report such injuries.
The Indian government should establish national standards and a
uniform protocol for the medical treatment and collection of medical
evidence in cases of sexual assault, and to eliminate the use of finger
tests on sexual assault survivors,
Human Rights Watch said.
“The Indian government needs to adopt and enforce measures to
ensure the dignified treatment and examination of sexual assault
survivors,”
Ganguly said.
“Dignity and accountability should
underscore the police and medical responses to sexual assault throughout
India.”
Urgent Need for Comprehensive Law Reform on
Sexual Assault
Indian civil society organizations have long called
for laws on sexual assault to be reformed.
Under current criminal law,
India does not have a general definition of sexual assault. It only defines
rape (penile penetration), “outraging the modesty” of women,
and “insulting the modesty” of women. Indian law does not
recognize the offense of marital rape.
It is especially
difficult to prosecute members of the security forces implicated in sexual
assault and other human rights violations.
The Armed Forces Special Powers
Act provides effective immunity to members of the armed forces who are
accused of sexual assault and other abuses.
Section 197 of the Criminal
Procedure Code provides effective immunity to police and other security
forces by making it mandatory for a prosecutor to obtain permission from
the government to initiate criminal proceedings against public servants.
The Criminal Law (Amendment) Bill, 2012, which was introduced
in the lower house of the parliament on December 4, introduces a definition
of “sexual assault” but limits it to all forms of penetrative
sexual assault.
Rights groups in India have, however, consistently pressed
for a comprehensive definition of sexual assault, which includes both
penetrative and non-penetrative forms of sexual assault.
Instead, the bill
retains the archaic definition of “outraging the modesty of a
woman” to cover all forms of non-penetrative sexual assault and
harassment.
It does not introduce any special procedural protections for
survivors who report sexual assault by police officers or members of the
armed forces.
“Law reform efforts should be comprehensive
and minimize the risks and delays that sexual assault survivors now
endure,”
Ganguly said.
“Police officers, soldiers, politicians,
and civil servants should not be above the law for sexual assault or
anything else.”
Death Penalty Not the Solution
After the December 16 gang rape, high-level government officials
announced that they will pursue harsher penalties for rape, including the
death penalty.
Human Rights Watch opposes the death penalty in all
circumstances as an inherently irreversible, inhumane punishment.
A
majority of countries in the world have abolished the practice.
In 2007,
the United Nations General Assembly passed a resolution by a wide margin
calling for a worldwide moratorium on executions.
“For
politicians, supporting the death penalty is an easy but ineffectual way
out,”
Ganguly said.
“It is much harder, but more effective, to
revamp the response of police, doctors, forensic specialists, prosecutors,
and judges to sexual violence.
Survivors deserve an effective, coordinated
response to sexual assault.”
Human Rights Watch Press release
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου
Σημείωση: Μόνο ένα μέλος αυτού του ιστολογίου μπορεί να αναρτήσει σχόλιο.